tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5131917496301371356.post4769485801701877162..comments2024-02-19T19:44:29.475-06:00Comments on AudioMatters: Reviewing the reviewsPatrickDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13954862314456749711noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5131917496301371356.post-63980382710945558482008-12-18T22:20:00.000-06:002008-12-18T22:20:00.000-06:00Thanks Mark -- the list is pretty inclusive, it's ...Thanks Mark -- the list is pretty inclusive, it's a surprise to be reminded how many such publications now deal with audio reviews, which adds to the problem of making sense of it all. To that end, I think the Daily Audiophile is a boon, I'm a regular reader. <BR/><BR/>Yep, it takes time to learn what the reviews are really saying, especially sine a lot of them don't actually say very much.PatrickDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13954862314456749711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5131917496301371356.post-59954163122299237222008-12-14T19:56:00.000-06:002008-12-14T19:56:00.000-06:00Great observations. I also tend to trust individua...Great observations. I also tend to trust individuals vs. publications, but I probably pay more attention to the difference than most readers. Getting to know the idiosyncrasies of individual reviewers took me a long time. Comparing my experience to theirs took even longer.<BR/><BR/>The poll is definitely too simplistic (in terms of the question and the choices) to tell us much, but I am also surprised that 6moons is the leading vote getter. I would have guessed Stereophile.<BR/><BR/>P.S. Sorry I didn't include more publications. Next time I'll make it more exhaustive!<BR/><BR/>Mark Wieman<BR/>Daily Audiophile<BR/><A HREF="www.dailyaudiophile.com" REL="nofollow">www.dailyaudiophile.com</A>Mark Wiemanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09598541351340413935noreply@blogger.com